Finally, someone has captured the full scope of the sustainability issue and resolved some of the inner conflict I have been experiencing lately. Protecting the natural environment isn’t the whole story: companies must consider their social, economic, and cultural impact as well. Sustainability is good business and therefore corporate social responsibility makes good sense to businesses and all of us. Intuitively I knew this but try to explain the logic in a ROI sense and it sometimes takes a leap of faith. It is sort of like trying to convince people that “motivated” employees are more productive. One doesn’t necessarily focus on just motivation. Similarly, the focus isn’t just on sustainability but on a broader vision and (North Star) goal that is more holistic and longer term. Adam Werback brings the issues together in a straight forward and simple way that is compelling.
The McKinsey article, When sustainability means more than ‘green’, is adapted from Adam Werback’s new book, Strategy for Sustainability: A Business Manifesto and reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Press. Copyright © 2009. Adam Werbach is the CEO of Saatchi & Saatchi, a former president of the Sierra Club (at age 23 in 1996), and the author of many works on sustainability, including the 1997 book Act Now, Apologize Later. I strongly encourage you to view this accompanying video interview, and then read the article.
True sustainability has four equal components:
- social, to address conditions that affect us all, including poverty, violence, injustice, education, public health, and labor and human rights
- economic, to help people and businesses meet their economic needs—for people: securing food, water, shelter, and creature comforts; for businesses: turning a profit
- environmental, to protect and restore the Earth—for example, by controlling climate change, preserving natural resources, and preventing waste
- cultural, to protect and value the diversity through which communities manifest their identity and cultivate traditions across generations
Popularity: 6% [?]